A few individuals put forth an opinion that if professional players are performing admirably, they are exempt from the condition of behaving properly while playing or otherwise. This essay is against this viewpoint.
One major reason for the stated disagreement is that conducting oneself and performing well are separate aspects. That is to say, neither of them can compensate in the absence of the other. Proper behavior by all is necessary in the world. Otherwise, it will be a very cruel and violent place regardless of sports success. For instance, a famous cricketer, Vijay Khanna, had slapped an opponent after hitting a century. He was fined rupees 1,000,000.
Another primary basis for the presented contradiction is that such a freedom will be a bad influence on children. To be precise, if children saw that successful and famous players are accepted with their narcissism, the children might consider it an essential trait for success. Hence, our young ones will also grow into badly-behaved individuals. To illustrate, once a rural boxer abused in excitement after having won a match. My nephew repeated his expletives.
Similarly, if sportspeople are not bound by social etiquette, they may harm other people. In other words, misbehavior often translates into aggression. Subsequently, this aggression can make a player hit or injure other individuals. Wrestlers are a good testimony to this phenomenon. They get to the point of killing others as a result of their anger.
In conclusion, adequate performances are no reason for behavioral impunity. Also, such an opportunity can lead to injuries or negative societal effects.
IELTS Oggy 